+108.3%
APO vs NXT
+178.8%
-70.5%
-42.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +1.2% | -1.8% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -1.1% | +0.1% | -0.9% |
| 30D | +3.5% | -15.3% | +18.8% | +5.7% |
| 3M | +4.5% | -43.8% | +48.3% | +12.2% |
| 6M | +22.8% | -18.7% | +41.4% | +24.0% |
| YTD | -6.5% | -3.0% | -3.5% | -8.2% |
| 1Y | +0.8% | +22.7% | -21.9% | -4.8% |
| 3Y | +62.0% | +95.9% | -34.0% | +38.3% |
| All | +108.3% | +178.8% | -70.5% | +52.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling