+112.8%
APO vs GTLB
-50.8%
+163.7%
-42.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.7% | +1.1% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -6.6% | +5.6% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -0.4% | +13.7% | -14.1% | -2.9% |
| 3M | -0.9% | +52.9% | -53.8% | -9.1% |
| 6M | +22.1% | +88.5% | -66.3% | +6.3% |
| YTD | -8.4% | +23.4% | -31.8% | -13.9% |
| 1Y | -0.9% | -3.8% | +2.9% | -3.1% |
| 3Y | +56.1% | -11.5% | +67.6% | +48.5% |
| All | +112.8% | -50.8% | +163.7% | +95.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling