+137.9%
APO vs GLDM
+143.3%
-5.4%
-42.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -0.9% | +0.3% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -0.5% | -0.5% | -1.0% |
| 30D | +3.5% | +4.4% | -0.9% | +3.3% |
| 3M | +4.5% | -1.1% | +5.6% | +4.4% |
| 6M | +22.8% | -13.7% | +36.4% | +22.6% |
| YTD | -6.5% | +2.8% | -9.3% | -6.8% |
| 1Y | +0.8% | +24.8% | -24.0% | +0.4% |
| 3Y | +62.0% | +127.8% | -65.9% | +53.4% |
| All | +137.9% | +143.3% | -5.4% | +109.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling