+36.1%
APO vs BTSG
+416.6%
-380.5%
-42.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -0.9% | +0.3% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +2.9% | -3.9% | -1.6% |
| 30D | -0.4% | +0.9% | -1.2% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -0.9% | +1.6% | -2.5% | -2.9% |
| 6M | +22.1% | +46.8% | -24.6% | +7.7% |
| YTD | -8.4% | +65.5% | -73.9% | -22.1% |
| 1Y | -0.9% | +136.2% | -137.2% | -24.0% |
| All | +36.1% | +416.6% | -380.5% | -15.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling