-64.9%
APLD vs ZETA
+73.8%
-138.7%
-71.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.7% | +5.3% | +4.4% | +9.4% |
| 7D | -12.7% | -0.4% | -12.3% | -12.7% |
| 30D | -34.7% | -8.0% | -26.7% | -34.9% |
| 3M | -46.1% | +21.4% | -67.5% | -44.6% |
| 6M | -64.9% | +80.1% | -144.9% | -59.5% |
| All | -64.9% | +73.8% | -138.7% | -59.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling