+443.7%
APLD vs TRGP
+311.4%
+132.3%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -1.2% | +3.0% | +2.7% |
| 7D | +4.1% | +0.8% | +3.3% | +3.4% |
| 30D | -11.7% | +11.5% | -23.2% | -20.3% |
| 3M | -40.3% | +9.0% | -49.3% | -46.0% |
| 6M | -8.0% | +20.5% | -28.5% | -25.4% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +59.5% | -52.0% | -32.9% |
| 1Y | +84.0% | +77.9% | +6.1% | +0.3% |
| 3Y | +356.2% | +253.6% | +102.7% | +27.0% |
| All | +443.7% | +311.4% | +132.3% | +33.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling