+443.7%
APLD vs NVS
+99.6%
+344.1%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NVS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -1.9% | +3.7% | +2.7% |
| 7D | +4.1% | +4.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
| 30D | -11.7% | +3.6% | -15.3% | -13.6% |
| 3M | -40.3% | +7.8% | -48.1% | -43.4% |
| 6M | -8.0% | -0.2% | -7.8% | -8.6% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +19.6% | -12.0% | -2.9% |
| 1Y | +84.0% | +28.4% | +55.6% | +57.9% |
| 3Y | +356.2% | +76.2% | +280.0% | +168.0% |
| All | +443.7% | +99.6% | +344.1% | +104.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling