+459.6%
APLD vs NBIX
+59.1%
+400.5%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | 0.0% | -4.1% | -4.1% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -1.7% | +10.6% | +9.7% |
| 30D | -6.6% | -5.9% | -0.7% | -4.5% |
| 3M | -35.2% | -6.1% | -29.1% | -33.9% |
| 6M | +0.4% | +19.4% | -19.0% | -6.9% |
| YTD | +10.7% | +9.4% | +1.3% | +5.5% |
| 1Y | +78.6% | +7.6% | +70.9% | +71.2% |
| 3Y | +423.9% | +42.0% | +382.0% | +322.9% |
| All | +459.6% | +59.1% | +400.5% | +214.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling