+443.7%
APLD vs MTZ
+197.8%
+245.9%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | +2.1% | -0.3% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -1.6% | +5.6% | +5.4% |
| 30D | -11.7% | -11.1% | -0.6% | -3.1% |
| 3M | -40.3% | -36.7% | -3.6% | -15.4% |
| 6M | -8.0% | -21.9% | +14.0% | +10.6% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +9.1% | -1.6% | -2.1% |
| 1Y | +84.0% | +30.0% | +54.1% | +45.6% |
| 3Y | +356.2% | +138.5% | +217.8% | +139.7% |
| All | +443.7% | +197.8% | +245.9% | +115.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling