+443.7%
APLD vs LNT
+21.7%
+422.0%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -0.1% | +4.2% | +4.1% |
| 30D | -11.7% | -3.2% | -8.5% | -10.5% |
| 3M | -40.3% | -4.1% | -36.2% | -39.9% |
| 6M | -8.0% | -4.6% | -3.4% | -7.4% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +7.0% | +0.5% | +2.0% |
| 1Y | +84.0% | +8.3% | +75.7% | +72.4% |
| 3Y | +356.2% | +51.0% | +305.2% | +236.0% |
| All | +443.7% | +21.7% | +422.0% | +428.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling