+373.4%
APLD vs GLDM
+128.8%
+244.7%
-71.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -0.9% | +2.7% | +2.7% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -0.5% | +4.6% | +4.7% |
| 30D | -11.7% | +4.4% | -16.1% | -15.4% |
| 3M | -40.3% | -1.1% | -39.2% | -39.3% |
| 6M | -8.0% | -13.7% | +5.7% | +7.1% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +2.8% | +4.8% | +6.6% |
| 1Y | +84.0% | +24.8% | +59.2% | +50.3% |
| All | +373.4% | +128.8% | +244.7% | +120.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling