+483.7%
APLD vs FITB
+63.8%
+419.9%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.4% | -0.7% | +8.0% | +7.9% |
| 7D | +16.6% | +2.8% | +13.7% | +13.9% |
| 30D | -3.1% | -4.5% | +1.4% | +0.5% |
| 3M | -30.9% | +5.7% | -36.5% | -34.4% |
| 6M | +12.6% | +17.1% | -4.5% | -2.0% |
| YTD | +15.5% | +18.3% | -2.9% | -1.5% |
| 1Y | +103.5% | +23.9% | +79.6% | +63.9% |
| 3Y | +446.5% | +131.1% | +315.4% | +142.1% |
| All | +483.7% | +63.8% | +419.9% | +293.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling