+443.7%
APLD vs FCEL
-90.8%
+534.5%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FCEL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | +1.9% | -0.1% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -15.8% | +19.9% | +8.9% |
| 30D | -11.7% | -29.3% | +17.6% | -3.3% |
| 3M | -40.3% | -30.1% | -10.1% | -38.3% |
| 6M | -8.0% | +74.4% | -82.4% | -31.2% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +104.5% | -97.0% | -23.2% |
| 1Y | +84.0% | +281.4% | -197.4% | +6.0% |
| 3Y | +356.2% | -66.1% | +422.3% | +348.9% |
| All | +443.7% | -90.8% | +534.5% | +650.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FCEL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FCEL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FCEL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FCEL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling