+192.2%
APLD vs EPAM
-44.5%
+236.7%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -14.7% | +20.6% | -35.3% | -20.5% |
| 7D | -27.0% | +23.0% | -50.0% | -32.7% |
| 30D | -44.1% | +51.6% | -95.7% | -52.0% |
| 3M | -52.6% | +50.8% | -103.4% | -59.8% |
| 6M | -64.5% | +51.1% | -115.6% | -70.7% |
| YTD | -42.2% | -19.1% | -23.1% | -38.9% |
| 1Y | -57.2% | +3.0% | -60.2% | -59.9% |
| 3Y | +159.5% | -31.2% | +190.7% | +174.5% |
| All | +192.2% | -44.5% | +236.7% | +215.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling