+244.7%
APLD vs ENPH
-84.5%
+329.2%
-81.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +2.1% | +5.4% | +6.9% |
| 7D | +3.1% | +4.1% | -1.0% | +2.2% |
| 30D | -29.4% | -11.4% | -18.0% | -27.4% |
| 3M | -42.8% | -30.5% | -12.2% | -36.9% |
| 6M | -59.5% | -20.2% | -39.2% | -57.1% |
| YTD | -31.8% | -9.3% | -22.5% | -32.5% |
| 1Y | -46.0% | -3.8% | -42.3% | -47.1% |
| 3Y | +252.0% | -61.5% | +313.5% | +277.9% |
| All | +244.7% | -84.5% | +329.2% | +329.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling