+50.8%
APH vs ZTS
-49.3%
+100.1%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -0.6% | +1.5% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -2.0% | +6.9% | +5.1% |
| 30D | -3.9% | +1.9% | -5.8% | -4.1% |
| 3M | +13.0% | -4.0% | +17.0% | +13.8% |
| 6M | +25.2% | -39.1% | +64.3% | +34.6% |
| YTD | +22.9% | -38.8% | +61.7% | +32.8% |
| All | +50.8% | -49.3% | +100.1% | +68.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling