+122.9%
APH vs NIO
-90.7%
+213.6%
-53.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -47.8% | -10.2% | -37.6% | -46.4% |
| 7D | -48.7% | -12.8% | -35.9% | -47.1% |
| 30D | -51.9% | -18.3% | -33.7% | -50.1% |
| 3M | -43.6% | -33.2% | -10.3% | -40.1% |
| 6M | -37.5% | -21.5% | -16.0% | -35.3% |
| YTD | -38.6% | -25.5% | -13.1% | -36.1% |
| 1Y | -26.3% | -38.0% | +11.7% | -22.0% |
| 3Y | +89.2% | -65.5% | +154.7% | +105.1% |
| All | +122.9% | -90.7% | +213.6% | +160.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling