+285.6%
APH vs MTB
+109.6%
+176.0%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -0.1% | +1.0% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +1.7% | +3.2% | +4.3% |
| 30D | -3.9% | -4.2% | +0.3% | -2.3% |
| 3M | +13.0% | +8.9% | +4.1% | +9.0% |
| 6M | +25.2% | +10.9% | +14.3% | +19.8% |
| YTD | +22.9% | +21.5% | +1.5% | +13.2% |
| 1Y | +47.8% | +21.9% | +25.9% | +35.8% |
| All | +285.6% | +109.6% | +176.0% | +192.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling