+285.6%
APH vs LPLA
+54.7%
+231.0%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -0.3% | +1.2% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -3.1% | +8.0% | +5.9% |
| 30D | -3.9% | -0.1% | -3.8% | -4.0% |
| 3M | +13.0% | +23.2% | -10.3% | +5.2% |
| 6M | +25.2% | +15.5% | +9.6% | +18.5% |
| YTD | +22.9% | +0.9% | +22.0% | +21.3% |
| 1Y | +47.8% | +0.2% | +47.7% | +45.7% |
| All | +285.6% | +54.7% | +231.0% | +245.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling