+50.8%
APH vs LNT
+8.4%
+42.4%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -0.1% | +5.0% | +4.9% |
| 30D | -3.9% | -3.2% | -0.7% | -4.6% |
| 3M | +13.0% | -4.1% | +17.0% | +10.7% |
| 6M | +25.2% | -4.6% | +29.7% | +22.5% |
| YTD | +22.9% | +7.0% | +15.9% | +19.8% |
| All | +50.8% | +8.4% | +42.4% | +48.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling