-37.5%
APH vs LMT
-20.6%
-16.9%
-53.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LMT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -47.8% | -5.8% | -42.0% | -45.0% |
| 7D | -48.7% | -6.6% | -42.1% | -46.0% |
| 30D | -51.9% | -8.5% | -43.4% | -49.5% |
| 3M | -43.6% | +1.8% | -45.4% | -40.2% |
| 6M | -37.5% | -19.9% | -17.6% | -36.4% |
| All | -37.5% | -20.6% | -16.9% | -36.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LMT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LMT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LMT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LMT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling