+285.6%
APH vs LEN
-24.6%
+310.2%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -1.0% | +1.9% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -3.2% | +8.1% | +5.5% |
| 30D | -3.9% | -4.9% | +1.0% | -3.1% |
| 3M | +13.0% | -8.5% | +21.5% | +14.4% |
| 6M | +25.2% | -20.7% | +45.8% | +29.4% |
| YTD | +22.9% | -17.4% | +40.3% | +26.0% |
| 1Y | +47.8% | -38.2% | +86.1% | +58.7% |
| All | +285.6% | -24.6% | +310.2% | +262.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling