+90.5%
APH vs HTZ
-86.4%
+176.9%
-53.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -47.8% | +1.3% | -49.1% | -47.8% |
| 7D | -48.7% | +12.7% | -61.5% | -49.0% |
| 30D | -51.9% | +47.4% | -99.4% | -52.9% |
| 3M | -43.6% | -54.9% | +11.3% | -42.2% |
| 6M | -37.5% | -47.0% | +9.5% | -36.6% |
| YTD | -38.6% | -55.3% | +16.6% | -37.4% |
| 1Y | -26.3% | -57.6% | +31.3% | -24.9% |
| All | +90.5% | -86.4% | +176.9% | +102.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling