-37.5%
APH vs GTLB
+111.1%
-148.7%
-53.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -47.8% | +7.1% | -54.9% | -45.8% |
| 7D | -48.7% | +11.2% | -59.9% | -46.6% |
| 30D | -51.9% | +37.8% | -89.7% | -48.8% |
| 3M | -43.6% | +61.6% | -105.1% | -38.8% |
| 6M | -37.5% | +98.9% | -136.5% | -27.6% |
| All | -37.5% | +111.1% | -148.7% | -27.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling