-37.5%
APH vs GLDM
-14.2%
-23.3%
-53.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -47.8% | -0.4% | -47.4% | -47.6% |
| 7D | -48.7% | -3.8% | -44.9% | -47.7% |
| 30D | -51.9% | +4.4% | -56.3% | -52.8% |
| 3M | -43.6% | -1.1% | -42.5% | -43.1% |
| 6M | -37.5% | -13.7% | -23.9% | -33.2% |
| All | -37.5% | -14.2% | -23.3% | -33.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling