-37.5%
APH vs ECHO
-24.1%
-13.4%
-53.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -47.8% | +3.9% | -51.7% | -48.1% |
| 7D | -48.7% | +3.9% | -52.6% | -49.0% |
| 30D | -51.9% | +2.4% | -54.3% | -52.1% |
| 3M | -43.6% | -28.0% | -15.6% | -41.0% |
| 6M | -37.5% | -21.2% | -16.3% | -38.6% |
| All | -37.5% | -24.1% | -13.4% | -38.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling