+18.3%
APD vs NIO
-93.2%
+111.4%
-31.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -4.9% | +5.0% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -14.5% | +18.3% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +8.2% | -15.0% | +23.2% | +9.4% |
| 3M | +4.3% | -35.6% | +39.8% | +7.5% |
| 6M | +4.7% | -55.7% | +60.4% | +10.8% |
| YTD | +31.5% | -43.1% | +74.7% | +35.9% |
| 1Y | +23.5% | -53.5% | +77.1% | +29.5% |
| 3Y | +29.1% | -59.8% | +88.9% | +32.3% |
| All | +18.3% | -93.2% | +111.4% | +28.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling