+27.2%
APA vs NIO
-59.9%
+87.1%
-62.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +5.9% | -3.3% | +2.3% |
| 7D | -15.5% | +5.6% | -21.1% | -15.8% |
| 30D | +2.4% | -4.2% | +6.6% | +2.6% |
| 3M | +22.8% | -26.3% | +49.1% | +25.2% |
| 6M | +17.9% | -42.5% | +60.5% | +22.1% |
| YTD | +87.7% | -33.5% | +121.2% | +90.8% |
| 1Y | +94.2% | -52.7% | +146.8% | +104.2% |
| 3Y | +27.2% | -57.5% | +84.7% | +32.3% |
| All | +27.2% | -59.9% | +87.1% | +32.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling