+85.4%
APA vs MSTZ
-99.3%
+184.6%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | +2.6% | -5.8% | -3.1% |
| 7D | +0.5% | -29.7% | +30.3% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +23.4% | -65.3% | +88.7% | +18.9% |
| 3M | +12.7% | -57.3% | +70.0% | +11.0% |
| 6M | +39.4% | -61.6% | +101.1% | +37.5% |
| YTD | +79.0% | -78.3% | +157.2% | +75.5% |
| 1Y | +88.8% | -30.2% | +119.1% | +104.4% |
| All | +85.4% | -99.3% | +184.6% | +78.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling