+88.2%
APA vs GLDM
+1.2%
+86.9%
-27.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +1.9% | -2.0% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -8.7% | +5.0% | -13.7% | -7.8% |
| 30D | -2.4% | -1.3% | -1.1% | -2.1% |
| 3M | +19.0% | -4.7% | +23.7% | +18.7% |
| 6M | +26.8% | -12.4% | +39.2% | +25.9% |
| YTD | +87.3% | -4.1% | +91.4% | +89.2% |
| All | +88.2% | +1.2% | +86.9% | +87.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling