+2.2%
AON vs GLDM
+99.6%
-97.5%
-33.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -2.8% | +1.9% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -3.2% | -5.5% | +2.3% | -3.6% |
| 30D | +21.7% | -7.0% | +28.7% | +20.9% |
| 3M | -5.1% | -12.3% | +7.2% | -6.3% |
| 6M | +5.9% | -17.9% | +23.8% | +4.3% |
| YTD | -4.8% | -10.3% | +5.5% | -7.0% |
| 1Y | -4.1% | -7.8% | +3.7% | -6.4% |
| All | +2.2% | +99.6% | -97.5% | -4.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling