+40.7%
ANET vs ZTS
-38.1%
+78.8%
-23.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.3% | -0.7% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -3.8% | +7.4% | +3.7% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -2.0% | +2.8% | +0.9% |
| 3M | +26.8% | -10.2% | +37.0% | +28.8% |
| 6M | +40.7% | -39.4% | +80.1% | +50.3% |
| All | +40.7% | -38.1% | +78.8% | +50.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling