+37.3%
ANET vs ZTS
-49.3%
+86.6%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -0.6% | +1.9% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -2.0% | +1.2% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -1.8% | +1.9% | -3.7% | -1.9% |
| 3M | +16.7% | -4.0% | +20.7% | +17.4% |
| 6M | +43.7% | -39.1% | +82.9% | +56.1% |
| YTD | +47.9% | -38.8% | +86.7% | +61.1% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | -49.6% | +86.8% | +62.7% |
| All | +37.3% | -49.3% | +86.6% | +62.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling