+16.2%
ANET vs ZTS
-26.9%
+43.2%
-24.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.0% | +7.5% | -2.4% | +5.2% |
| 7D | -4.4% | +15.4% | -19.8% | -3.9% |
| 30D | -13.7% | +25.8% | -39.5% | -13.5% |
| 3M | -6.3% | +18.1% | -24.4% | -5.8% |
| 6M | +3.4% | -19.7% | +23.1% | +10.6% |
| YTD | +36.2% | -27.5% | +63.7% | +48.8% |
| 1Y | +16.2% | -26.7% | +43.0% | +27.0% |
| All | +16.2% | -26.9% | +43.2% | +27.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling