+835.1%
ANET vs ZM
+46.9%
+788.2%
-52.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -0.7% | -1.3% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -2.7% | +1.5% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -10.0% | +5.5% | -3.1% |
| 3M | +24.5% | +1.6% | +22.9% | +23.5% |
| 6M | +35.4% | +25.0% | +10.4% | +29.4% |
| YTD | +44.2% | +10.6% | +33.6% | +40.3% |
| 1Y | +25.4% | +14.0% | +11.4% | +21.3% |
| 3Y | +284.8% | +32.5% | +252.3% | +260.7% |
| 5Y | +761.7% | -68.3% | +830.0% | +770.8% |
| All | +835.1% | +46.9% | +788.2% | +806.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling