+313.3%
ANET vs ZETA
+269.4%
+43.9%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | -1.2% | +6.9% | +5.9% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -3.7% | +6.7% | +3.8% |
| 30D | -5.2% | +5.7% | -10.9% | -6.5% |
| 3M | +27.6% | +50.4% | -22.8% | +15.5% |
| 6M | +44.4% | +65.5% | -21.1% | +27.1% |
| YTD | +52.3% | +48.3% | +4.0% | +35.8% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +45.4% | -15.0% | +15.5% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | +270.8% | +42.5% | +156.5% |
| All | +313.3% | +269.4% | +43.9% | +156.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling