+37.3%
ANET vs ZETA
+68.7%
-31.5%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -4.1% | +5.3% | +1.8% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +2.7% | -3.5% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -1.8% | +15.8% | -17.6% | -4.2% |
| 3M | +16.7% | +35.4% | -18.7% | +11.4% |
| 6M | +43.7% | +67.1% | -23.4% | +31.4% |
| YTD | +47.9% | +54.1% | -6.2% | +33.8% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | +67.8% | -30.6% | +27.1% |
| All | +37.3% | +68.7% | -31.5% | +27.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling