+791.3%
ANET vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+891.3%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | -7.0% | +12.7% | +5.7% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -5.4% | +8.4% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -24.8% | +19.6% | -5.0% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -62.8% | +90.4% | +25.9% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -99.5% | +143.9% | +39.9% |
| YTD | +52.3% | -99.8% | +152.1% | +47.3% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -99.9% | +130.3% | +25.9% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | -100.0% | +413.2% | +306.9% |
| All | +791.3% | -100.0% | +891.3% | +772.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling