+292.5%
ANET vs USB
+95.2%
+197.4%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | USB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -0.3% | +1.5% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +1.4% | -2.3% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -1.3% | -0.5% | -1.3% |
| 3M | +16.7% | +15.2% | +1.5% | +10.3% |
| 6M | +43.7% | +18.8% | +24.9% | +33.7% |
| YTD | +47.9% | +21.0% | +26.9% | +36.4% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | +34.0% | +3.3% | +21.4% |
| All | +292.5% | +95.2% | +197.4% | +209.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside USB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus USB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × USB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded USB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling