+291.3%
ANET vs SWKS
-8.3%
+299.6%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SWKS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | +9.8% | -11.8% | -5.1% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +17.5% | -18.8% | -6.5% |
| 30D | -4.5% | +23.0% | -27.5% | -11.0% |
| 3M | +24.5% | +19.5% | +5.0% | +16.7% |
| 6M | +35.4% | +54.3% | -18.9% | +15.8% |
| YTD | +44.2% | +35.3% | +9.0% | +28.1% |
| 1Y | +25.4% | +17.9% | +7.5% | +16.1% |
| All | +291.3% | -8.3% | +299.6% | +284.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SWKS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SWKS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SWKS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SWKS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling