+291.3%
ANET vs ROL
-1.4%
+292.7%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ROL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | +0.1% | -2.1% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -3.2% | +1.9% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -6.6% | +2.1% | -4.7% |
| 3M | +24.5% | -27.3% | +51.8% | +24.0% |
| 6M | +35.4% | -38.1% | +73.4% | +35.9% |
| YTD | +44.2% | -41.8% | +86.0% | +45.4% |
| 1Y | +25.4% | -37.8% | +63.2% | +26.0% |
| All | +291.3% | -1.4% | +292.7% | +275.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ROL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ROL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ROL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ROL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling