+294.5%
ANET vs QLD
+185.6%
+109.0%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | QLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +0.3% | +0.9% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +0.6% | -1.4% | -1.2% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -0.1% | -1.7% | -1.8% |
| 3M | +16.7% | -8.4% | +25.1% | +24.1% |
| 6M | +43.7% | +32.2% | +11.5% | +13.6% |
| YTD | +47.9% | +28.9% | +19.0% | +19.4% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | +43.8% | -6.6% | +1.2% |
| All | +294.5% | +185.6% | +109.0% | +77.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside QLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus QLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × QLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded QLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling