+79.9%
ANET vs PLTU
+140.2%
-60.3%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.8% | -0.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -0.8% | +4.4% | +3.5% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -8.8% | +9.5% | +1.5% |
| 3M | +26.8% | +41.7% | -14.9% | +13.9% |
| 6M | +40.7% | -9.3% | +49.9% | +34.6% |
| YTD | +47.2% | -35.2% | +82.5% | +47.7% |
| 1Y | +36.0% | -29.5% | +65.4% | +30.6% |
| All | +79.9% | +140.2% | -60.3% | +17.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling