+86.7%
ANET vs PLTD
-76.9%
+163.6%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | -0.7% | +6.3% | +5.4% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +4.2% | -1.2% | +4.4% |
| 30D | -5.2% | +0.7% | -5.9% | -4.6% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -32.4% | +60.0% | +15.0% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -26.2% | +70.6% | +37.6% |
| YTD | +52.3% | -17.0% | +69.3% | +54.2% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -26.7% | +57.1% | +27.9% |
| All | +86.7% | -76.9% | +163.6% | +25.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling