+313.3%
ANET vs PH
+137.8%
+175.4%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +1.7% | +3.9% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -1.3% | +4.3% | +3.9% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -11.0% | +5.8% | +2.3% |
| 3M | +27.6% | +5.5% | +22.1% | +23.5% |
| 6M | +44.4% | +1.5% | +42.9% | +42.0% |
| YTD | +52.3% | +8.8% | +43.6% | +42.6% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +24.5% | +5.9% | +10.4% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | +141.2% | +172.1% | +162.3% |
| All | +313.3% | +137.8% | +175.4% | +162.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling