+299.5%
ANET vs PDD
-19.4%
+318.8%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PDD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.4% | +0.4% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -4.4% | +8.1% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -15.5% | +16.2% | +3.4% |
| 3M | +26.8% | -4.1% | +30.8% | +27.2% |
| 6M | +40.7% | -23.4% | +64.1% | +46.2% |
| YTD | +47.2% | -30.7% | +77.9% | +55.5% |
| 1Y | +36.0% | -37.6% | +73.6% | +46.0% |
| All | +299.5% | -19.4% | +318.8% | +291.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PDD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PDD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PDD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PDD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling