+292.5%
ANET vs PATH
-3.6%
+296.1%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PATH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -16.6% | +17.9% | +4.3% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -16.3% | +15.5% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -1.8% | +9.9% | -11.7% | -4.4% |
| 3M | +16.7% | +30.2% | -13.4% | +9.2% |
| 6M | +43.7% | +37.2% | +6.5% | +31.7% |
| YTD | +47.9% | -7.3% | +55.2% | +46.9% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | +40.0% | -2.7% | +19.8% |
| All | +292.5% | -3.6% | +296.1% | +260.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PATH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PATH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PATH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PATH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling