+313.3%
ANET vs NCLH
-10.7%
+323.9%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +1.7% | +3.9% | +5.2% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -4.8% | +7.8% | +4.1% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -21.7% | +16.5% | -0.2% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -22.2% | +49.9% | +33.6% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -27.5% | +71.9% | +52.4% |
| YTD | +52.3% | -33.6% | +85.9% | +62.3% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -45.0% | +75.4% | +45.1% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | -11.0% | +324.3% | +309.1% |
| All | +313.3% | -10.7% | +323.9% | +309.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling