+313.3%
ANET vs MTZ
+160.5%
+152.8%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | +3.5% | +2.1% | +3.9% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +1.4% | +1.6% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -14.5% | +9.3% | +2.1% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -32.9% | +60.6% | +51.8% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -20.8% | +65.2% | +55.2% |
| YTD | +52.3% | +10.6% | +41.7% | +35.9% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +27.1% | +3.3% | +7.3% |
| 3Y | +313.3% | +166.1% | +147.1% | +190.0% |
| All | +313.3% | +160.5% | +152.8% | +190.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling