+120.7%
ANET vs MSTZ
-99.1%
+219.9%
-50.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | -3.8% | +9.4% | +5.3% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +17.0% | -14.0% | +4.4% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -61.8% | +56.6% | -10.8% |
| 3M | +27.6% | -54.6% | +82.2% | +24.1% |
| 6M | +44.4% | -59.3% | +103.6% | +42.2% |
| YTD | +52.3% | -74.6% | +126.9% | +50.1% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -18.8% | +49.2% | +44.6% |
| All | +120.7% | -99.1% | +219.9% | +113.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling