+37.3%
ANET vs MSTZ
-29.5%
+66.7%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +2.6% | -1.4% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -29.7% | +28.9% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -65.3% | +63.5% | -8.2% |
| 3M | +16.7% | -57.3% | +74.1% | +14.2% |
| 6M | +43.7% | -61.6% | +105.4% | +41.2% |
| YTD | +47.9% | -78.3% | +126.2% | +41.7% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | -30.2% | +67.5% | +46.2% |
| All | +37.3% | -29.5% | +66.7% | +46.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling